Lemon Law — No Win No Fee
Lemon laws protect consumers who purchase defective vehicles. Most lemon law claims operate on a fee-shifting basis — the manufacturer pays your attorney fees if you prevail — meaning you pay nothing upfront and nothing from your recovery.
How Do Lemon Laws Work?
Direct Answer: Lemon laws require manufacturers to replace or refund a defective new vehicle after a reasonable number of repair attempts fail. Every state has its own lemon law, and the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act provides additional protection. Fee-shifting means the manufacturer pays your attorney fees if you win.
State lemon laws require manufacturers to replace a defective new vehicle or refund the purchase price if the vehicle has a "substantial defect" that cannot be repaired after a "reasonable number of attempts." While the specifics vary by state, most require:
- The defect must be substantial (affecting safety, value, or use)
- The defect must be covered by the manufacturer's warranty
- The manufacturer must have had a reasonable number of repair attempts (typically 3–4 for the same issue)
- Or the vehicle must have been out of service for a cumulative period (typically 30+ days)
Fee-Shifting in Lemon Law Cases
Most state lemon laws and the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act include fee-shifting provisions that require the manufacturer to pay the prevailing consumer's reasonable attorney fees. This makes lemon law claims uniquely consumer-friendly: you pay nothing upfront, and your attorney fees come from the manufacturer — not from your recovery.
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.) is a federal consumer protection law that supplements state lemon laws. It applies to any consumer product with a written warranty and allows consumers to sue for breach of warranty in state or federal court. Attorney fees are recoverable by prevailing consumers. It can be particularly useful for used vehicles with warranties, leased vehicles, or in states with weaker lemon laws.
Frequently Asked Questions
You May Also Be Interested In
Where this applies: Contingency fee rules are set state by state. Check your own state's rules before acting.
Sources for this page
Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.
- ABA Model Rule 1.5 (Fees)
Model, not law. Each state adopts its own version. Rule 1.5(d) bars contingency fees in most domestic relations matters and in criminal defence.
- Cornell LII — contingency fee
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) (costs to the prevailing party)
A losing plaintiff may be ordered to pay the defendant's taxable costs. There is no US equivalent of QOCS.
Who wrote and checked this page
- Written and published by
- Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
- Legal review
- This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
- Review dates
- Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.
Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.