Skip to content

General information only — not legal advice. Published by Edward & Amaury Solicitors, solicitors regulated by the SRA (no. 800525). How that affects what you read.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review, wherever you are.

Reviewed August 2026

No Win No Fee and Contingency Fees, Explained for the US and the UK

United States & United KingdomLast reviewed 2 August 2026

“No win no fee” means your lawyer is paid only if your case succeeds. The phrase covers two different systems. In the United States it means a contingency fee — the attorney takes an agreed percentage of what you recover. In England and Wales it usually means a Conditional Fee Agreement — the solicitor charges their normal costs plus a success fee, and takes nothing if the case fails. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own rules.

In every system, “no fee” refers to your lawyer’s fee — it does not always mean no costs at all. Every guide here shows the jurisdiction it covers, the date it was last checked, and the legislation it is based on.

What Is No Win No Fee?

"No win no fee" is a broad term for legal funding arrangements where a client does not pay their lawyer's professional fees unless their case succeeds. It exists in various forms across common-law jurisdictions worldwide, but the two most developed systems are in the United States and the United Kingdom.

In the United States, this is known as a contingency fee agreement. The attorney agrees to represent the client in exchange for a percentage of the damages recovered — most commonly around one third, and often more if the case is filed or tried. If the case is lost, the attorney receives no fee, though the client may still be responsible for case costs such as court filing fees and expert witness charges.

In the United Kingdom, the equivalent arrangement is a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). Under a CFA, the solicitor charges their normal base costs plus a "success fee" — an uplift of up to 100% of those costs — only if the case wins. Separately, in personal injury claims, no more than 25% of your damages may be taken — calculated on general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity plus past financial loss, but not future financial loss, and after deducting benefits recoverable by the Compensation Recovery Unit. The UK also permits Damages-Based Agreements (DBAs), which work more like US contingency fees.

Both systems exist to ensure access to justice for people who cannot afford to pay legal fees upfront. However, the rules, regulations, caps, and cost consequences differ significantly between — and even within — each country.

How the Two Systems Compare

Direct Answer: Both mean your lawyer is paid only if you win, but they work differently. A US contingency fee is a percentage of what you recover. A Conditional Fee Agreement in England and Wales pays the solicitor their normal base costs plus a success fee — with a separate cap on how much may come out of your damages. The percentages are not measuring the same thing, so they cannot be compared directly.

US contingency fees compared with England and Wales conditional fee agreements
Feature🇺🇸 United States🇬🇧 England & Wales
NameContingency feeConditional Fee Agreement (CFA)
How the lawyer is paidA percentage of the recoveryBase costs plus a success fee uplift on those costs
Governing rulesState conduct rules based on ABA Model Rule 1.5; state statutesCourts and Legal Services Act 1990 s.58; Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013
Cap on the lawyer’s shareNo general cap; some states cap fees in specific case types such as medical malpracticeSuccess fee ≤ 100% of base costs; in PI, ≤ 25% of specified damages may be taken from compensation
Case expenses“Costs” — separate from the fee; treatment on a loss depends on the agreement“Disbursements” — separate from costs; often covered by ATE insurance
If you loseNo attorney fee; defendant’s taxable costs may be awarded against you (FRCP 54(d)); no QOCS equivalentNo solicitor’s fee; QOCS usually prevents enforcement of the defendant’s costs in PI claims, subject to exceptions
InsuranceNot typically part of the arrangementATE insurance common; premiums generally not recoverable from the opponent post-LASPO
Prohibited case typesCriminal defence and most domestic relations matters (Model Rule 1.5(d))Criminal and most family proceedings

Scotland and Northern Ireland follow different rules — see the UK nations compared. Read the full comparison, contingency fee vs no win no fee and US vs UK legal costs, or the global guide to no win no fee.

47+ Practice AreasComprehensive coverage
US & UK LawTwo jurisdictions, one resource
Reviewed August 2026Next review February 2027
Written for ClarityNot billable hours

Think You Have a Claim?

🇬🇧 United Kingdom: get a free, no-obligation case review from Edward & Amaury Solicitors, the SRA-regulated firm that publishes this site.

Request a UK case review

🇺🇸 United States: get a free, no-obligation case review from Cross & York.

Request a US case review

Submitting a form does not create a solicitor-client or attorney-client relationship. You are free to instruct any firm — regulator directories are listed at the foot of this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does 'no win no fee' mean?

No win no fee is a funding arrangement where your lawyer or solicitor only gets paid if your case is successful. In the US, this is called a contingency fee agreement. In the UK, it is known as a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). If you lose, you typically do not pay your lawyer's fees — though other costs may still apply depending on your jurisdiction.

How is no win no fee different in the US and UK?

In the United States a contingency fee is a percentage of what you recover, agreed directly with your attorney. In England and Wales a Conditional Fee Agreement works differently: the solicitor charges their normal base costs plus a success fee, which cannot exceed 100% of those costs. Separately, in a personal injury claim the amount that may be taken from your damages is capped at 25% of general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity plus damages for past financial loss — not future financial loss — after deducting benefits recoverable by the Compensation Recovery Unit. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own rules.

What types of cases can be taken on a no win no fee basis?

In both countries, personal injury is the most common case type. In the US, contingency fees are also widely used for medical malpractice, employment discrimination, class actions, and mass torts. In the UK, CFAs cover personal injury, clinical negligence, employment disputes, housing disrepair, and certain other civil claims.

Do I have to pay anything if I lose my case?

This varies significantly by jurisdiction. In the US, most contingency fee agreements mean you pay no attorney fees if you lose, but you may still owe case costs (filing fees, expert witness fees). In the UK, Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting (QOCS) protects personal injury claimants from paying the defendant's costs if they lose, with limited exceptions.

What percentage does a no win no fee lawyer take?

There is no single figure in the United States. One third of the recovery is the most commonly reported arrangement, often rising if the case is filed or goes to trial, and some states cap fees in specific case types — California limits medical malpractice fees to 25% before a complaint is filed and 33% after. In England and Wales the success fee cannot exceed 100% of the solicitor's base costs, and in personal injury claims no more than 25% of specified damages may be taken from your compensation.

Are no win no fee agreements regulated?

Yes, in both countries. In the US, contingency fees are governed by state bar rules and the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (Rule 1.5). In the UK, conditional fee agreements are permitted by section 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 as amended, capped by the Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, and solicitors are regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. LASPO 2012 changed what can be recovered from the losing party; it did not create or regulate CFAs.

Can any lawyer work on a no win no fee basis?

Any licensed attorney in the US can offer contingency fee arrangements for permitted case types (some jurisdictions prohibit them for criminal and family law matters). In the UK, solicitors, barristers, and licensed legal professionals can offer CFAs, subject to SRA or Bar Standards Board regulation.

What is the difference between a CFA and a DBA?

A Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) is the UK equivalent of a no win no fee deal — the solicitor charges a success fee on top of base costs. A Damages-Based Agreement (DBA) is closer to the US contingency model — the solicitor takes a percentage of the damages awarded. DBAs are permitted in England and Wales under the DBA Regulations 2013.

Is this site giving me legal advice?

No. This site provides general legal information for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no solicitor-client or attorney-client relationship is created by using this site. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change over time. Always consult a qualified legal professional for advice on your specific situation.

Why does this site cover both US and UK law?

The term 'no win no fee' is used globally but means different things in different legal systems. We cover both the US and UK because these are the two largest common-law jurisdictions where no win no fee arrangements are most developed, and many people searching for information conflate the two systems.

Sources for this page

Every rule stated above is based on the primary sources below. Each link goes to the legislation, court rule or regulator itself so you can check it. Last verified 2 August 2026.

  1. Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s.58 (conditional fee agreements)

    The provision that makes CFAs lawful and enforceable. CFAs derive from this section, not from LASPO.

  2. ABA Model Rule 1.5 (Fees)

    Model, not law. Each state adopts its own version. Rule 1.5(d) bars contingency fees in most domestic relations matters and in criminal defence.

  3. Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, arts. 4–5 · in force from 1 April 2013

    Art. 4 caps the success fee at 100% of base costs. Art. 5 caps what may be taken from damages in personal injury at 25% of PSLA plus past pecuniary loss, net of CRU, at first instance.

  4. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 44 (incl. rr.44.13–44.17, QOCS)

    Qualified one-way costs shifting and its exceptions. Rule 44.14 was amended with effect from 6 April 2023.

  5. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) (costs to the prevailing party)

    A losing plaintiff may be ordered to pay the defendant's taxable costs. There is no US equivalent of QOCS.

Who wrote and checked this page

Written and published by
Edward & Amaury Solicitors (Edward & Amaury Ltd, company no. 12195443), regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no. 800525.
Legal review
This page has not yet been through independent legal review. It is written from the primary sources listed below, which you can check directly.
Review dates
Last reviewed 2 August 2026. Next review due 2 February 2027.

Fee rules change. California’s medical malpractice fee limits changed on 1 January 2023, and the QOCS rules in England and Wales changed on 6 April 2023. If you spot something out of date, tell us — we publish corrections.

Think you have a claim? Get a free case review, wherever you are.